Showing the value of a story

El Confidencial's paywalls had grown into a set of mismatched variants. I redesigned them, and we tested the new concepts against the existing wall to see which converted best. The existing wall won.

Role
Product designer
Client
El Confidencial
Focus
Subscriptions
Year
2024
Showing the value of a story

Context and design problem

Over the years El Confidencial had built up several paywall variants, many of them made by the subscriptions team rather than by design. They didn't match each other or the design system. The brief was to bring them into one family and find out which way of presenting the offer converted best.

Context and design problem

Research process

We started with an audit, then benchmarked other outlets and looked at which behavioral principles could work on a paywall. The designs that survived went into a multivariate test in Piano, the platform that runs El Confidencial's paywall.

We listed every paywall variant in use and the situations each one covered, so the new designs would support all of them.

Key questions

Modal, inline, or banner?

A modal covers the article, an inline wall sits in the text and a banner sits at the bottom of the screen. Each placement changes how much the wall can say and how easily a reader can dismiss it.

Which value proposition converts best?

Do we lead with features, with what being a subscriber is like, or with an appeal to support independent journalism?

Direct payment or landing page?

A landing page has room to explain the offer, but it adds a step before payment.

How much content to show first?

Should the wall appear straight away or partway through the article? And if partway, how far in?

Personalized paywalls?

Should a reader arriving from Google Discover, who rarely subscribes, see the same wall as a loyal reader who is close to subscribing?

Microsubscriptions?

Could we sell a single article, or give one away in exchange for registering? What would that cost, technically and financially?

Designing the options

We designed each concept for desktop, tablet, mobile web and the app to find the edge cases. Reviews with stakeholders narrowed them down to three designs to test against the existing wall.

Designing the options

The concepts

Test results

The control won. The existing wall, a plain comparison of the monthly and annual price, had the best chance of being the top performer, about 75% in Piano's model, ahead of all three new designs. The test ran in Piano from May 2024 across inline, banner and modal placements. The research behind the new designs was sound, and the simpler wall still did better.

Test results

Takeaways

In this test, walls that sat inside the text got more engagement than modals covering the article or banners that are easy to dismiss.